This site uses cookies. Some are essential to the operation of the site; others help us improve the user experience. By continuing to use the site, you consent to the use of these cookies. To learn more about cookies, please read our privacy policy.
Learn more
OK
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Login
Skip auxiliary navigation (Press Enter).
Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Toggle navigation
Search Options
Home
Forums
Blogs
Events
Groups
Local User Groups
Special Interest Groups
Programs
Fortinet Data Defender
Red Carpet Program
Get Started
About Fuse
Become a Volunteer
Resources
Get NSE Certified
Knowledge Base
Video Libary
COVID-19 Response
Secure Email Gateway
Group Navigator
View Only
Group Home
Discussions
71
Library
3
Members
20.6K
Back to discussions
Expand all
|
Collapse all
Fortimail: Typical settings for concurrent connections inbound
Thread closed by the administrator, not accepting new replies.
1.
Fortimail: Typical settings for concurrent connections inbound
0
Recommend
Donald
Actions
Options Dropdown
Blog This
Posted Oct 11, 2019 10:40 AM
No replies, thread closed.
In IP Policy and Conenction Settings there is a setting for :
"Maximum concurrent connections for each client:"
Out of the box it seems this was 5. We've had a couple of issues with voting software sites like ElectionBuddy and SimplyVoting where email is seriously impacted from the low limit. The election sites need to send a unique message per recipient and they want to send it quickly.
I've increased ours to 10 for the time being as it seems to match what they need.
I know that value is also important to protect against DOS and to kill the productive use of spam software.
Looking for any input on what seems to be an industry standard for concurrent connections per client. Third party services should not be in a position to advise on what our limits should look like when they have no responsibility for the side effects.
×
New Best Answer
This thread already has a best answer. Would you like to mark this message as the new best answer?
Powered by Higher Logic